Ask a biological question

According to the definition of the book [In the process of alternating the community, after the new species settled, the original species could still exist. Because replacement is an advantage, not replaced by], but the book also said that [competitive relationship can extinguish disadvantaged species. ]
This pitying culture was caused by Darwin's "Origin of Species" for more than 150 years.
Why are it called "on (hypothesis)" for 150 years?
What is Darwin's "evolutionary theory"? Why is there only a politicalist who has received treasures and does not have a real scientist. R n Who would randomly "evolve" hypothesis as "science" as "science" as "science"? If it is really "natural selection, the survival of the fittest", which pests, and beasts are far more "survived by human beings", then the earth is all harmful insects, toxic snakes, and fierce beasts. Because they are "strong and suitable" that can survive in any environment, they have carnivores even among plants, and many extremely low -level insects and beasts will use chemicals to kill people. Can be hidden. So people are just uncomfortable people, and they can not exist on the earth for a long time. Is there anyone in the world?
The scientifically discovers that only one sperm is accepted into the eggs, and others are not allowed to enter. If Darwin has no destination "natural evolution" hypothesis is really scientific, then at least 100 million sperm can be randomly "selected" into the eggs, then the world's life is all strange.
In the population of the corner never guided them to mobilize and persuade them to say, "Illness is very harmful." Scientists have been tracked and studied for more than 10 years. The animal world without moral constraints can prevent incest by itself. This driving force is there, science has not been unable to solve the mystery. Is it ideal theory? Can you explain it with "evolution theory"?
The people who are very rare to come to this world, just in less than 100 years, if they get fake, for example, buy a pure gold, The diamond ring is a bronze ring of glass, and the Japanese wild mountain ginseng is dry. What do you feel about?
of course, in the era of law, there are clear stipulated in the law box. They will be dealt with by legal criminal or civil treatment. However, in the short life, if you buy money, if you are all fake, the day when you close your eyes, you do n’t even know what the most basic self is. It ’s really in vain for 100 years.
5000 years ago, Cangjie saw that there were two corners on the head of the "cow" and four feet under the belly. The word "fish" was created. Seeing that the "fish" had no feet, only one tail, it created a " The word "Niu". When the professor was spread to various tribes, he was careless and turned upside down. Only one tail does not have feet as "cow", and the four feet are read "fish". Thousands of miles away teach people to read the word "heavy". Conversely, the two mountains should represent the "heavy" word of "heavy" but teach people to read the word "out". To this day, have readers and chiefs noticed it? Who can replace the pronunciation of these words? Is it not wrong to replace the pronunciation of these words? Is it shit or urine and only do n’t let it go?
Whether the four feet of "fish" are painted into tails and will be wrong. No one cares about it. Can't get true knowledge, what about its four feet and eight feet?
The best -selling [Northern United Publishing Media (Group) Co., Ltd. Publishing Company, the best -selling "Northern United Publishing Media (Group) Co., Ltd. Book 214-129 article said:" 'The theory of evolution "only builds a rough theoretical framework for biological evolution, and many inner details have not been paid to the moment. The dominance of study research, but today people find that this guiding ideology may guide people to walk into the dead Hu Tong. The most obvious example here is anatomical medicine. Medicists are facing nerve transmission, conscious chain, and meridian acupuncture points. The confusion that cannot be cracked.
The "evolutionary theory" authoritative Gurd's "Since Dalvin" article of paleontology and scientific historians "The concept of life is just a science of the evolution of biological species if this kind of life. The doctrine, then it can be ended now, but it is okay. The concept of concept has now become the basic doctrine of modern society.
"Darwin Evolution Theory" article 122 article: "Is it only because of a small mutation of a certain individual, it can form a new species? The variation of variation appeared in the birds flying in the air. In order to fly in the air, there are many necessary changes that need to be climbing: reptile forelimbs should be evolved into wings used to fly; brain evolves to control wings; internal hollow in the bones, to reduce weight ... Just like a car, if you want to become an airplane, the engine from appearance to internal engines must be changed greatly. It is difficult for us to imagine that the above situation can be completed because of gradual mutation. "
The article also acknowledged the contradiction between" Darwin's theory of evolution "is the contradiction between the fossils discovered and the conclusions of the conclusions discovered so far. In the research of fossils so far, no intermediate fossils of the evolutionary process were found, which means that there are many unknown mysteries. ... But so far people have not found a giraffe fossil with medium -length length. As long as the physical evidence in the middle of the evolution is not found, this mystery cannot be completely solved. Darwin's "evolution theory" is incomplete, and there will be objections and controversy. "
Tence Tencent Technology News (Jianlong/Compilation) One of the top ten unsolved mysteries of the top ten scientific and top scientists in 2010:" Signs of the early days of life seem to be simple. 100 million years ago. How they appeared, no one knew. The answers are different from the chemical reactions around the hot spring to the rock formation. Diana Northamp, a cave biologist at New Mexico State University, said: ‘Many theories about the origin of life have been proposed, but because it is difficult to obtain proof or refute, none of the theories that have been fully accepted, ... '"
" Darwin Evolution Theory "article clearly states: Marcus's theory has given Darwin's idea. The Malassas theory has a key impact on Darwin and Alfred Wallace, the founders of" modern evolution ". Darwin said in his book "Origin of Species": "His theory is the application of Marcus theory in an area without human intellectual intervention. Darwin is a worshipers of Marsas for life. "Calling him" a great philosopher ". Wallace calls Marcus's work" ... the most important book I have read ", and uses him and Darwin to develop the" evolutionary theory theory of evolution theory through learning the theory of Malassas theory. "It is called" the most interesting coincidence. "
Darwin's autobiography is also blunt. In October 1838, I occasionally read Tomas Robert Malaxus's cruel" AN ESSAY on the Principle of). The influence and inspiration of the theory have enlightened his evolutionary views ...; Marcus estimates that the population will grow rapidly without controlling. In his opinion, the main factors of controlling the population are disasters such as war, famine and disease. According to this brutal proposition, for some people's survival, others must die. Survival means "eternal war". Scholars of "evolution" generally recognize Malassas to inadvertently make many contributions to "evolution theory". Thinking about population issues is the basis of modern evolutionary theory. Malassas strengthened observation of "survival struggle" under the condition of "limited growth". Due to the theory of Malassas, Darwin realized that survival competition not only occurred between species, but also the same in the same species, but also the same the same. The interior of the species is performed.
"Darwin Evolution Theory" 42 article clearly reads: Marcus' theory gives Darwin's idea. Real scientists are the facts of facts, and have been publicly concluded. The description of the "Survival" of the play. For example, if a young man who has cut his head, even his pants are pulled down to let you see, you have to stigmatize him to say that he is a "little girl", so what else can there be to allow Your eyes see the real thing, and do n’t you talk about it? Is this person really distinguishing what is called "science" and what is called "struggle philosophy"? Today's literature is really "magic" and "science". Is it classified?
Darwin was influenced by these ideas, and proposed that the strong and the fittest would win in the survival struggle. Carl Marx wrote the inscription on his second version of "Capital Theory" and presented it to Darwin. Called himself as a loyal admirer of Darwin.
The politicians specially from the world, Engels, admired Darwin's "evolutionary theory", especially appreciated the hypothesis of "human beings originated in the ancient ape" and made some important points to it. Supplement.
"Darwin Evolution Theory" 76 articles, Darwinism himself also acknowledged that it is "the essential of the times"; with the advent of capitalism and colonialism, "evolution theory" has become necessary. For faith capitalism freedom of freedom of capitalism For economic capitalists, "natural elimination", "survival of the fittest", and "survival competition" are undoubtedly new weapons to fight socialists who advocate the position of the weak and conservatives who do not like to change. Darwin's "evolution theory" It provides legitimate theoretical support for the exploitation of the capitalist society and the dominance of the colonies.
"biology" that contains the philosophy of political struggle, which caters to many long -awaited people. Pushed Darwin to a very respected " Heroes "throne. "Evolution Theory" no longer needs to be logical, biological, archeology, or any more convincing evidence that has become an unquestionable axiom. This is the fact of history. Even in the current Darwinist leader circle, real scientists are recognized.
"Reference News" February 18, 2009 Reprinted [Spain "World News" February 10] The article from Malcolm Hinez understands people: "Darwin rarely writes scientific papers, but "Species Origin" is worth reading as literary works. "The article clearly states that Darwin and Lincoln are epoch -making politicians. The work of robbing resources, two years later, founded the "Natural Selection" theory. "
The real scientists who have ignored human existences that" apes and monkeys "have changed? "Evolution" is "science"?
Obviously it is undoubtedly a huge blow to real biological science. The theological thoughts of moral concepts and peaceful consciousness are naturally a deadly opponent. Because it is not scientific at all, it completely changes the norms and directions of biological sciences. It was the need for the situation of the struggle during the capitalism and colonialist period at that time. So what is the reason why the absurd struggle philosophy is so ignorant of biology to today?
Sadly, because the political circles needed for the struggle that year, it is inevitable that there are so many unknown internal feelings that follow the internal affairs. The streams are "science" and fighting.
The naked "weak meat and strong food" struggle philosophy of "evolution theory", which has been unable to prove for more than 150 years, and the real scientists of the "evolution theory" hall today cannot be archived as the law of science. "This is what the core of Darwin's city understands that the" evolutionary theory "itself has a clear fact that high -level experts and scholars have long been clear. Because the dominant factor of discovering biological evolution is not the" evolution theory "of natural selection; that is, only, only, only, only, only As a literature, it can be promoted by the people who do not know, because there are more than 150 years of influence, and the argument of Darwin's "evolution theory" that cannot be removed for a while is inconsistent with biology. It is also because the "evolution theory" itself lacks scientific defects. Records such as fossils are not consistent with Dar literature. Evidence has encountered many difficulties. People have seen that "evolution theory" cannot be expressed in many places. Until today, only the brains are looking for another argument instead of "evolution theory" and constantly modifying the arguments;
The "straight theory", "theory of student source", "isolation theory", "the theory of isolation", " "Objectives", "Internal Selection", "The theory of mobile balance", "naturally occur", "virus evolutionary theory", "Ramakism", "New Lamacism" and so on. Shan Darwinism has "Darwinism", "New Darwinism" and "Modern Darwinism" and so on. 20世纪，有关进化的各种理论又得到新的飞跃进展，不同有关进化的各种理论层出不穷，以辩证唯物主义观点，综合已有的揭示生命进化的达尔文主义，间断平衡论、新灾变论、 Various theories such as mutation theory, large -scale chemistry, collaborative evolution theory, molecular evolution neutral doctrine and other theories. The number of "evolution theory" is dazzling and dazzling, each with thousands of autumn and high theory. So far, no argument is really credible, and it is completely unified after 10,000 years. These scientific evidence and differences of scientific evidence and differences in these face -to -face challenges are because of the Darwin's own Xuansun and the grandchildren of each other show their own disadvantages. As a "evolutionary theory" gatekeeper who wants to fish straw in the hands of Darwin Xuansun, which is the argument of the "evolutionary theory" at the hands of Darwin Xuansun, which one do you want to shoot? R n is really confused, no matter how many scientists are opposed by facts; regardless of the "evolution theory" core leaders, they also acknowledge "evolution theory" or hypothesis. The "six major suspension cases", still closed with eyes closed, and shouting "Emperor's New Clothing" in a stiff mouth?

First of all, I have not seen the definition you put forward. I don't know if it is correct. My answer below is just personal opinion. In fact, my answer is simple. The prerequisites of these two definitions are different! The condition of the first definition should be part of the advantages between the two species; the condition of the second definition is the entire advantage.